- #MASTER WPA2 WORDLIST GENERATOR#
- #MASTER WPA2 WORDLIST PASSWORD#
- #MASTER WPA2 WORDLIST OFFLINE#
- #MASTER WPA2 WORDLIST CRACK#
If "apple", "zebra", "rocket" and "icepick" were words 137, 17542, 126 (respectively), the passwords "apple zebra rocket icepick" and "137 17542 12640 7284" have the same strength. We could actually replace the words themselves with the index of the word in the table and there would be no loss of strength provided there are delimiters between the "words" so there's no risk that two words catenated without a delimiter is the same as any other substring or word in the dictionary. The words themselves don't actually matter, only that there are N of them and the probability of choosing any particular word is the same as choosing any other particular word.
#MASTER WPA2 WORDLIST PASSWORD#
For example, I still remember a three-word password I entered last night, where I would never have remembered it had it been just random characters of the same.
![master wpa2 wordlist master wpa2 wordlist](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/6a4a49_048822cb52524628a88db39bd21abf39~mv2.png)
I find these word passwords really interesting and human-friendly.
#MASTER WPA2 WORDLIST CRACK#
If I understand it correctly, are you saying that even if someone knew that I tended to choose passwords that were for example 4 diceware words separated by a symbol (word#word#word#word), the sheer number of possibilities this pattern allows would make it practically impossible to crack in a useful time frame? The important part, of course, is to allow the system (such as 1Password's Words option) to choose the password. Though it's not very likely, I'd prefer not to create a network that could be breached by someone Your "Kantian Principle of Advice" is very interesting. Which site do you use to calculate how long it would theoretically take to crack a password? My primary concern is against possible attempts to access the network or its data. It seems that choosing a passphrase composed of more than 3 or more words would be ideal for wifi. Hi and very much for your detailed replies.
#MASTER WPA2 WORDLIST OFFLINE#
Certainly a 3-word Diceware password will beat the ever so common phone number-or-address-as-key (don't laugh, I'm an IT consultant and those are frighteningly common!), but something in the 4-7 range would be stronger against an offline attack, however less likely. The likelihood of this happening to a given wireless network is low compared to a web-enabled system being attacked due to geographic limits, but I wouldn't rule it out if you're looking for security to match a full-length password. The attacker would need to be within range of the wireless network and not on the Internet only (but this could be anyone within several blocks of the network, though they'd likely need a large sample of data to work with). There are ways (and if none exist for WPA2, which I'd have to look up, a way may be found as there have been for previous wireless encryption standards) to capture enough of a wifi conversation that the original key could be derived from an offline attack based upon the captured data.
![master wpa2 wordlist master wpa2 wordlist](https://i.postimg.cc/gkxBsQh4/4-Way-Handshake.png)
![master wpa2 wordlist master wpa2 wordlist](https://sudorealm.com/images/1600341998.png)
I disagree slightly that a wifi password is not subject to an offline attack. And my master password is also in the over 25 character range. That's ok, the link is the one I was thinking of. You asked a very important question here:Īpparently I took long enough to type my first reply that it wasn't even the first! (It was when I started it :-) If you want to see more detailed discussion of this point, please take a look at Īnyway, for a typical WiFi password, a three word wordlist password from our list gets you 42 bits of strength, which is more than enough for defending on-line attacks. So the fact that in a technical sense, a random 64 character password is enormously stronger, it wouldn't be adding any meaningful security as the 99 bit wordlist password is already overkill. Quite frankly it would already more than the age of the universe to crack that, and it would consume far more electricity than humanity produces to try to crack it.
#MASTER WPA2 WORDLIST GENERATOR#
Don't reuse these anywhere else.)Ī seven word password using our wordlist generator gets you 99 bits. (Uniqueness, however, is very very important.
![master wpa2 wordlist master wpa2 wordlist](https://www.yeahhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/wpa2-cracking8.png)
Unless there is something particularly unusual about your setup, there is no real threat of offline attacks against such a password, and so the strength requirements of them really huge. Quite frankly, both a 64 character password and a seven word Diceware password are overkill for a WiFi password.